Over the last decade, numerous large firms have tapped into the global knowledge pool by setting up Global Centers of Excellence (CoE) in talent-rich locations. More than 200 of the Fortune 500 companies have established CoE’s in India alone. This trend is now being followed by mid-size firms and even smaller companies. The key question for these businesses is whether to set up their own CoE or leverage third-party outsourcing firms. Both options come with their own set of pros and cons.

Pros and Cons of Setting Up a Global CoE vs. Outsourcing

Setting Up a CoE:

Pros:

1. Control and Customization: Having a fully owned CoE allows firms to have complete control over their operations, processes, and culture. This can lead to better alignment with the parent company’s goals and values.
2. Data Security: With a Global CoE, companies can implement their own security measures, reducing the risk of data breaches.
3. Talent Retention: Directly managing employees can lead to higher retention rates as companies can offer better career development opportunities and a stronger organizational culture.

Cons:

1. Initial Investment: Setting up a CoE requires significant upfront investment in infrastructure, technology, and human resources.
2. Management Complexity: Managing a Global CoE involves dealing with local regulations, cultural differences, and operational challenges.
3. Time-Consuming: Establishing a Global CoE can be a lengthy process, requiring time to recruit and train staff, and set up operations.

 

Outsourcing:

Pros:

1. Cost Efficiency: Outsourcing can be more cost-effective, especially for smaller operations, as it eliminates the need for significant upfront investments.
2. Flexibility: Outsourcing allows companies to scale operations up or down based on demand without the complexities of managing a large workforce.
3. Focus on Core Activities: By outsourcing non-core activities, companies can focus on their primary business functions and strategic goals.

Cons:

1. Less Control: Outsourcing means relinquishing some control over processes and quality, which can lead to inconsistencies.
2. Data Security Risks: Sharing sensitive information with third-party vendors can increase the risk of data breaches.
3. Dependency on Vendors: Companies may become overly reliant on their outsourcing partners, which can be risky if the vendor faces issues.

 

Making the Decision

On balance, it makes sense to outsource when the overall scale is small and scope of operations covers mostly non-core workstreams. While there is no hard headcount number, it is generally believed that setting up a fully owned Global CoE is more beneficial for headcounts above 100, covering several diverse, strategic/core workstreams.

A conservative and common strategy is to start small and expand based on success. Until reaching a critical headcount when setting up a fully owned CoE makes sense, firms can still hire and directly manage delivery teams but leverage third parties for shared services like HR, facilities, and administration.

In conclusion, the decision to set up a Global CoE or outsource depends on the specific needs and circumstances of the company. By carefully weighing the pros and cons, firms can make an informed decision that aligns with their strategic goals and operational requirements.

 

Back to Blog